|
Posts:
3,421
From:
Houston
Registered:
9/5/03
|
|
(1 of 8)
Iran will invade Iraq in September
Aug 19, 2004 9:25 AM
|
Here it comes. Al Sadr is the point man for Iran, and the Iraqi government is about to take him out. Iran intended all along to invade Iraq in September to secure control of Iraq, and of course, its oil fields. (This will make FINA very happy, no doubt, and the French government will move back into Iraq, just like they were doing under Saddam.) Look for French companies to be with the Iranian invasion in roles like logistics support.
Iran contends that it is preemptive and is protecting itself, just as it was preemptive and protecting itself when it removed 80 percent of the candidates from the ballot and arrested most of them. Iran is a dictatorship and terrorist nation that has global intentions. Invading Iraq serves the same purpose to Iran that invading Eastern Europe and France served Hitler. And, just as France joined Hitler after that event, so will they be on the side of the terrorists again.
Here it comes....
|
|
|
Posts:
10
Registered:
4/13/02
|
|
(2 of 8)
Aug 20, 2004 10:44 AM
|
Since there is one small factor you did not even mention in your analysis called the United States Military.
Small detail, and the only reason Iran in its craziest mood would never dare attack liberated Iraq.
And if they did, it would only be another year or so at most before we would effectively liberate the people of Iran (many who are tired of the thoecracy and would join us in the fight) as well.
"The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit." John 3:8
|
|
|
Posts:
3,421
From:
Houston
Registered:
9/5/03
|
|
(3 of 8)
Re: Possible, but not likely
Aug 20, 2004 3:00 PM
|
No doubt the Iranian military would be blown to bits. But, the effect would be to put Kerry in the White House. Then, Kerry would give Iraq to Iran, and Iran wins and gains control of the Iraqi oil fields. Naturally, after this, the Saudi oil fields will be undefended, and Iran will assert itself as the legitimate governing authority over the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. Of course, these cities sit next to the Saudi oil fields, and Iran will then control them also.
Take note that the oil company that has controlling influence in Iran is FINA, a French oil company. Look for France to be part and parcel of the invasion. they will undoubtedly have a major roll in logistics support and weapons supply.
Just as France joined the terrorist at the beginning of World War II, so are they working for the Iranian terrorists today.
|
|
|
Posts:
2,104
From:
Oklahoma City
Registered:
4/9/03
|
|
(4 of 8)
Re: Iran will invade Iraq in September
Aug 27, 2004 12:12 PM
|
Chris,
I think it would be to the U.S.'s advantage if Iran did. Iran is another country that has to be taken over and cleaned out. If Iran made a move on the Iraq it would be perfect in my opinion. We may get the opportunity to shoot up some french ships--tres bien!
|
|
|
Posts:
3,421
From:
Houston
Registered:
9/5/03
|
|
(5 of 8)
Re: Iran will invade Iraq in September
Aug 27, 2004 2:21 PM
|
I agree that, given normal circumstances, it would be good for the war against terrorism if Iran opened itself up against us.
But, here in America, just as during the Cold War, there is a mindless sect that thinks any loss suffered by the United States is good. If this loss is not suffered on the military, it will be forced on them by subsequent government actions, given that they are in control of at least one branch of government. This normally 1 or 2 percent is actually, in my estimation, 35 percent. It will not matter who opposes the United States, they will support the enemy.
The probably result will be that Kerry will win the election, which is their intent. They know that, with Kerry in the White House, Iraq is as good as theirs, and the offensive will be, just as the disasters the NVA suffered were taught, successful.
The very same people who sabotaged the military success in South Vietnam are still players today, and with just as much influence. As a result of their success in allowing Vietnam to be conquered by the communist, an additional 3.5 to 5 million innocent people were murdered within 2 years after the war ended. After Kerry gives Iraq to Iran, the same will be true.
In all cases, without exception, when these so-called "anti-war" people have success, the result is massive genocide and murder by their allies. I see no reason to believe that this will be any different.
They demand miraculous results in Iraq. It has only been a little more than a year since the long-time dictator Saddam was removed. Yet, this (ignorant) horde is presenting arguments that this is a disaster, it is hopeless, and are promoting surrender to the terrorists today. It is identical to their tactics during Vietnam.
If Bush loses, then Iraq will be taken over by Iran, and the Iranian dictatorship will survive to continue exporting terrorism all over the world. And, thanks to Clinton giving China the most modern nuclear weapons and ICBM technology in the world, which China promptly gave to Iran, among other nations, the terrorists will have nuclear weapons identical to the most modern ever designed by the United States, ICBM guidance equal to the most modern every designed by the United States, control of OPEC, and in position to assert its claim of being the rightful authority over the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. Only an idi?t will think that Iran will not take these cities with a military incursion. With these cities will come the Saudi oil fields. After this, Iran will control 60 percent of the known oil reserves in the world, which will give them control of the world's economy. Imagine that, the leading terrorist nation given control of the world's economy by the "anti-war" left in America.
Now, about "anti-war".... The "anti-war" element in America is not anti-war. In fact, they are pro-war. They give their support to warring factions, provided that warring faction is battling against the United States. During Vietnam they made folk heroes of Che Guevera, Mao Tse Tung, and applauded Jane Fonda when she posed on a weapon of war. Anti-war society would not even come close to doing these things, yet these people who fraudulently call themselves "anti-war" did this exact thing. And, not only did they not distance themselves from any warring faction, they joined the communists in their war, and lent any assistance toward the effort to kill additional Americans in Vietnam. that anyone at all still believes these sects were in the least anti-war amazes me. But, it is true that they still insist that they were anti-war, when in fact they were just anti-America.
|
|
|
Posts:
140
Registered:
8/26/04
|
|
(6 of 8)
Re: Iran will invade Iraq in September
Sep 6, 2004 11:42 AM
|
|
I hope so. This will give the free nations the situation to defend themselves thus eliminating another terrorist nation.
|
|
|
Posts:
654
Registered:
10/12/02
|
|
(7 of 8)
Are you really Paul Wolfowitz?
Sep 20, 2004 7:45 PM
|
>>>Iran is another country that has to be taken
>>>over and cleaned out. 'Remey 688'
>If Iran made a move on the Iraq
> it would be perfect in my opinion. >We may get the
> opportunity to shoot up some >french ships--tres bien!
As you, just like he, sound like the enemy.
The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason. ~ Paul Wolfowitz, as quoted in Vanity Fair, May 2003
|
|
|
Posts:
140
Registered:
8/26/04
|
|
(8 of 8)
Re: Iran will invade Iraq in September
Sep 23, 2004 5:42 PM
|
|
Iran, by developing nuclear bombs, may be invaded by the coalition forces before then
|
|
|
|
|
