|
Posts:
3
From:
San Rafael, CA
Registered:
10/29/09
|
|
(1 of 6)
Synthetic-EM Fields, NOT Anti-Gravity Folks!
Oct 29, 2009 11:15 PM
|
First, the force of Gravity is a WEAK force and really only comes into play with really large things, like planets. Second, using an electro-magnetic approach to overcome Gravity, given the ease of creation & manipulation, is going to be FAR easier than synthesizing and controlling Gravity. Given this, the use of a whole-lotta-power from a Total-Annihilation Reactor would be needed to create the field, HOWEVER Difficult......NOT IMPOSSIBLE! By combining a Cyclotron Circulation Unit with a couple four Tesla Coils, and a BIG Micro-Wave Emitter Dish, you IN THEORY could create an Elector-Magnetic Field capable of "Pushing-Off" the natural Magnetic Fields, overcoming Gravity. This would be a great advantage over traditional rocket power as attaining "Break-Away" speed would no longer be required, making take-off and landing a whole lot easier and cooler at slower speeds. Given the Miss-Direction Scientists have taken in creating Magnetic Fields by using HUGE magnets to control the fields, nothing available can create the power, or the Magnetic Fields, strong enough to do this --yet. If we did focus on the problem, it wouldn't be long until a lightweight system COULD create a large enough Magnetic Field, strong enough to be a propulsion system, wink, wink.
You know, IF such a system WAS in use, it would be very interesting to view, as such fields would surly act to refract any light traveling through the field, reflect off the vehicle's surface, and back out again, like heat-waves on a desert road in the sun --making it VERY difficult to ever photograph......Hmmmm, I wonder what that sounds like?? 
|
|
|
Posts:
4,013
From:
Florida or the Matrix
Registered:
2/2/08
|
|
(2 of 6)
Re: Synthetic-EM Fields, NOT Anti-Gravity Folks!
Oct 30, 2009 8:17 PM
|
Inventor,
First, gravity is NOT a weak force...it is in a separate spectrum(not E/M) with Excitation fields, they are inversely related...increasing Excitation or exciting or accelerating electrons from their nuclei = reduces gravity,mass and inertia...and accelerates time and shifts frequencies.
You are correct in that using the permanent magnet or mag vortex system is the only practical way for achieving Anti-grav.
Your theory on needing an annihilation reactor to power the field with huge amounts of energy is not necessary. The conservative fields around and inside the ship stripping electrons can be made to absorb unlimited amounts of potential energy...by simply reversing or using ac current on the weak static pole instead of pulsed dir current. This limits the stripped or accelerated electrons to lightspeed(not faster as in excitation fld). There will be a huge absorption of energy(able to be used when accelerating electrons faster than light to Excitation field where electrons have less charge and transitions occur using less energy. Mag vortex, and Electric Vacuum allow for any manipulation of energy....and the eventual Excitation field allowing for reduced grav,etc,etc SAVVY? -Man out of Time
--
Listen closely, UNTAINTED FACTS,LOGIC,STATISTICAL PATTERNS,PARTICIPANTS TESTIMONY,AND SIMPLE COMMON SENSE = ADD TRUTH TO YOUR DAY!!!
|
|
|
Posts:
12,369
From:
Knoxville, TN
Registered:
3/5/01
|
|
(3 of 6)
Re: Synthetic-EM Fields, NOT Anti-Gravity Folks!
Oct 30, 2009 8:32 PM
|
Why put the magnetic propulsion on the craft? Once it's beyond the Earth's magnetic field the drive would be nearly useless and some sort of reaction (rocket) propulsion would be needed.
The easy solution is to use electromagnetism to launch the craft. A linear accelerator could be used to accelerate the craft to orbital or escape velocity. After all, the most difficult part of getting to space is overcoming Earth's gravity. That takes a speed of roughly 5 mps for LEO and 7 mps for Earth escape velocity. If that velocity could be imparted by a ground based installation like a linear accelerator the craft would only need to carry enough fuel for orbital maneuvering. There would be no need for the huge fuel tanks, external boosters and multiple stages of conventional rockets.
--
Humans will harbor the most idiotic thoughts and commit the most appalling acts in the name of whatever god they've created and decided to worship.
|
|
|
Posts:
4,013
From:
Florida or the Matrix
Registered:
2/2/08
|
|
(4 of 6)
Re: Synthetic-EM Fields, NOT Anti-Gravity Folks!
Oct 31, 2009 10:25 PM
|
Blacky,
Mag propulsion is unnecessary....correct. It is the E/M or mag vortex used in conjunction with electric vacuum which is used ONLY to get you into Excitation field and REDUCE your gravity,mass,inertia so leaving the earths grav is easy(your ship is out of phase with earths 1g grav). THIS IS WHY YOU SEE UFOS SHOOT UP INTO SPACE AT UNBELIEVABLE SPEEDS...there is no G force acting on them-excitation fld. And you don't need velocity,linear accelerators or huge fuel tanks...you are thinking in SLOW TIME OR GRAVITY FIELD...NOT....EXCITATION FIELD OR FAST TIME.
You are comparing a covered wagon to a Ferrari...telling me I need a big fast horse...when I'm telling you no I need high octane fuel...apples and oranges. -Man out of Time
--
Listen closely, UNTAINTED FACTS,LOGIC,STATISTICAL PATTERNS,PARTICIPANTS TESTIMONY,AND SIMPLE COMMON SENSE = ADD TRUTH TO YOUR DAY!!!
|
|
|
Posts:
19
From:
Princeton Indiana
Registered:
11/10/09
|
|
(5 of 6)
Re: Synthetic-EM Fields, NOT Anti-Gravity Folks!
Nov 10, 2009 5:52 PM
|
|
Why does it need a rocket to propel it thru space i have never seen a rocket on a comet have you?When you get to the stratoshere there is no gravity i'm assuming.Wrenches and other misc traveling around the planet what forces are happening to propel a wrench at 17,000 miles per hour
|
|
|
Posts:
248
Registered:
1/14/09
|
|
(6 of 6)
Re: Synthetic-EM Fields, NOT Anti-Gravity Folks!
Nov 11, 2009 12:36 PM
|
> Why does it need a rocket to propel it thru space i
> have never seen a rocket on a comet have you?When you
> get to the stratoshere there is no gravity i'm
> assuming.Wrenches and other misc traveling around the
> planet what forces are happening to propel a wrench
> at 17,000 miles per hour
There is still gravity, just not friction. By propelling something to a specific speed you offset the forces of gravity with an equal force in an opposite direction. The further you get the less gravity there is, but were there not movement the gravity would pull you progressively faster the closer you get.
|
|
|
|
|
