Welcome Guest  —  47 members and 93 guests online

Women of Camelot: New JFK assassination conspiracy theory

[Replies: 2]
Last Post Oct 15, 2009 6:30 PM by: scgator2001
Posts: 37
From: Utica IL
Registered: 7/24/08
(1 of 3)

Women of Camelot: New JFK assassination conspiracy theory

Sep 26, 2009 12:10 PM
Hey Folks,
My Dad just got me to watch Women of Camelot. I got an idea while watching the scene where Jackie first meets Onassis: Onassis had the money, the connections, and the potential motive(having Jackie for himself) to have gotten JFK whacked. Let the conversation begin.
SD
Posts: 1,623
From: Utica, IL
Registered: 5/5/08
(2 of 3)

Re: Women of Camelot: New JFK assassination conspiracy theory

Oct 7, 2009 7:29 PM
> Hey Folks,
> My Dad just got me to watch Women of Camelot. I got
> an idea while watching the scene where Jackie first
> meets Onassis: Onassis had the money, the
> connections, and the potential motive(having Jackie
> for himself) to have gotten JFK whacked. Let the
> conversation begin.
> SD
Sounds like you're an RFK fan with his prosecutor's zeal.
TH
Posts: 2
From: Columbia, SC
Registered: 10/15/09
(3 of 3)

Re: Women of Camelot: New JFK assassination conspiracy theory

Oct 15, 2009 6:30 PM
The problem with the theory is that nobody outside the government could have possibly forged evidence like was done to hide the truth.

To debate that statement you have to prove that there was a conspiracy. That is easy to do but it's hard to get Americans to think that there could really be a definitive answer to this question after so much over the years.

In this video I show that there are two ways to measure the time spacing between shots. One way to measure the spacing detected three shots (the Zapruder film) and the other way detected 5 shots. The spacing between the last three shots IN BOTH is 4.8 seconds followed by 0.7 seconds. Add in that many witnesses said the last two shots were fired almost on top of each other, you have something that would lead any reasonable person to think there is a match.

Next you then go to the fact that an audio recording supplies the same information as a radar screen, you can determine WHERE the shooters were located.

Knowing all this HOW could someone outside the government have altered evidence? The answer is they couldn't, the lies were told from inside the government.

You know have seen the first piece of the puzzle. With a bit more information you'll finally understand who did this and why.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwjM2wVwFQs

Regards

Bill Charleston
advertisement
no image