|
Posts:
2,904
Registered:
9/11/08
|
|
(1 of 2)
how do evolutists explain blood clotting in man?
Dec 31, 2008 10:40 PM
|
|
I know those cave men were a violent lot and would be always hacking each other arms off. They would need a good many blood clotting chromosome in their blood. Yet, now, it is rare that people hack each other arms off for fun, yet biochemists have found a nice little chromosome floating around in our blood stream. It's only purpose is to stop mass bleedings.Don't take my word for it. I read it in a book by Michael Behr called "Darwin's black Box. He might be wrong.
|
|
|
Posts:
197
From:
NYC
Registered:
1/2/09
|
|
(2 of 2)
Re: how do evolutists explain blood clotting in man?
Jan 5, 2009 1:43 PM
|
You answered your own question. "Cavemen" that didn't have the ability to clot died out while those that could clot survived to pass on those traits to us. It's a process. You need to understand genetics to understand evolution. Look at dogs and dog breeding. How new breeds can be created while singaling out a specific trait. It's not different in humans.
Skin pigmentation changed as humans moved into places with less sunlight. The less sunlight, the harder it was for dark-skinned people to obtain the vitamin D from the sun. Therefore, the darker-skinned people had more difficulty reproducing in the darker environment while the lighter-skinned people flurished.
--
"A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for... is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stuart Mill
"Is god willing to prevent evil but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is god able but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is god both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is god neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?"
-- Epicurus
|
|
|
|
|
