Welcome Guest  —  36 members and 90 guests online

How do evolutionist explain the evolution of blubber in the arctic cold?

[Replies: 1]
Last Post Jan 5, 2009 1:51 PM by: Onodera
Posts: 2,904
Registered: 9/11/08
(1 of 2)

How do evolutionist explain the evolution of blubber in the arctic cold?

Dec 31, 2008 10:35 PM
Evolution of a particular gene takes years to adapt and in the arctic,life must adapt in seconds to survive. Imagine yourself as sea lion pup in the ice age. A sea lions pup needs that gene now, not millions years from now. Unless it already has or its ancestor had that gene, then it would have it.i If not, it dies and if none of the sea lions have blubber in them.They will dead in not minutes but in a few seconds especially in the waters. If one is to pass on the genes for the next generation, one must be able to do so.There were dinosaurs that lived in the cold weather so did they have blubber gene. Evolution was a theory developed on an tropical island where it is warm.
Posts: 197
From: NYC
Registered: 1/2/09
(2 of 2)

Re: How do evolutionist explain the evolution of blubber in the arctic cold?

Jan 5, 2009 1:51 PM
It didn't happen in seconds and it doesn't have to be so. Seals born with the genes that cause blubber will survive while those without will die. This happened a long time ago in a different envirnment. Because of evolution, the seals you mentioned have this gene and they survive. Are some still born without the blubber gene? Perhaps, but they would not survive and thus not reproduce, keeping the gene pool filled with genes that contain blubber.

Dinosaurs...? That's your "gotcha" evidense? How about hairy elephants? Evolution doesn't work in the cold? It's in the harshest environments that evolution is most visible.

Read a book about evolution before you try and disprove it with a "gotcha" question.

--
"A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for... is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stuart Mill

"Is god willing to prevent evil but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is god able but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is god both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is god neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?"
-- Epicurus
advertisement
no image