http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216 T-34's en LiveForums Enterprise 4.1.2 (www.liveworld.com) Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:54:08 -0800 42 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520740040#msg520740040 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520740040#msg520740040
> > That would would mean that the Mk-V Panther was
> the
> >]]> Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:40:58 -0700 Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:40:58 -0700 Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:40:58 -0700 Wicingas false 700011846 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520734148#msg520734148 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520734148#msg520734148 > the
> > best overall tank in every category.
>
> Not]]> Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:48:06 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:48:06 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:48:06 -0700 JBark false 300012896 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733810#msg520733810 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733810#msg520733810 > best overall tank in every category.

Not really.

> It had]]> Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:58:25 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:58:25 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:58:25 -0700 lwd false 700012208 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733767#msg520733767 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733767#msg520733767
That would would mean that the Mk-V Panther was the best overall tank in every]]> Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:35:06 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:35:06 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:35:06 -0700 mikeforrest2003 false 72569 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733396#msg520733396 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733396#msg520733396 > push the Germans back hundreds of miles and inflict
> nearly one million casualties.

One]]> Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:19:29 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:19:29 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:19:29 -0700 JBark false 300012896 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733394#msg520733394 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733394#msg520733394 > understanding that the doctrine on the Eastern front
> t included firing on]]> Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:17:45 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:17:45 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:17:45 -0700 JBark false 300012896 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733268#msg520733268 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733268#msg520733268 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:58:01 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:58:01 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:58:01 -0700 mike215 false 282896 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733238#msg520733238 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520733238#msg520733238 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:19:16 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:19:16 -0700 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:19:16 -0700 lwd false 700012208 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520732715#msg520732715 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520732715#msg520732715 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:07:13 -0700 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:07:13 -0700 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:07:13 -0700 JBark false 300012896 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520732373#msg520732373 http://boards.history.com/topic/World-War-Ii/T-34s/520058216?messageID=520732373#msg520732373 I didn't say that. I said it was no more magnificent than a club. T-34's were crude (or simple, if you prefer) machines. As with any crude weapon,]]> Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:23:55 -0700 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:23:55 -0700 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:23:55 -0700 wokelly false 520007823